Gina Temple: Important Details on Organizational Change

There is more than one way to go through organizational change.

In organizations, Gina Temple explains that change translates to opportunities and is ultimately preferable to stagnation. The health of many enterprises is often tied to their willingness to embrace internal organizational changes on a regular basis.

However, people cannot be faulted for being wary of change, particularly if it comes with its own sets of risks and uncertainties. In the same manner, as investors take risks and rewards in careful consideration before buying stock or funding an enterprise, so should organizations be careful in making sweeping changes.

Some respond by maintaining a conservative attitude toward organizational change, slowing down, or even preventing changes on the mistaken belief of not fixing what is not broken. Although taking the turtle route may seem in line with the careful risk management and healthy level of skepticism needed in decision-making, it opens up the danger of gradually becoming risk-averse and eventually stagnant.

Indeed, findings suggest that the opposite may be even more beneficial for an organization in the long term. For example, Accenture’s findings show that businesses displaying the best benefits realization have changes occurring at a rather fast pace, though these come with the risk of falling into previously unseen setbacks.

These pitfalls are often pre-existing conditions endemic to the organization. Companies should, in the process of implementing adaptive organizational changes, be aware of the possibilities of these setbacks, rectify them as they come, and also learn to detect them early on. Gina Temple adds that all these should be accomplished while maintaining the changes they mean to implement in the process.

You can optimize efficiency through organizational change.

According to Gina Temple, an efficient and effective organizational structure can provide a business with the edge it needs to give its competitors a run for their money. A streamlined organizational structure will get things done quickly with the lowest reasonable cost. It will be a veritable, well-oiled powerhouse geared towards growth.

Much of the advantages of a streamlined, efficient organizational structure will lie in its ability to accomplish processes in a shorter time. As companies grow and hire more people, there may be relatively simplistic arrangements that work in their startup phase, which would no longer be able to handle the demands of production. Larger employee populations will need a multilevel system of management that is elastic and resistant to bloating.

Likewise, Gina Temple says that business goals may need a system capable of oversight. For example, a business that looks to increase and improve the quality of its products may require a more rigorous inspection protocol. It needs to be both fast and effective to keep up with the increasing demands of production.

No business should adopt a slapdash approach to organizational structure. A poorly arranged organizational structure would crumble under the weight of the output of the employees or their managers, resulting in massive inefficiencies and needless losses. To succeed, Gina Temple says that an expanding business must make well-laid-out plans for its organizational structure, preferring systems that are thorough and elastic enough to satisfy its enterprise goals.

Gina Temple has served in the healthcare community for over 30 years with experiences ranging from for-profit to not-for-profit organizations, unionized to non-unionized facilities, and acute care settings to outpatient centers. Read similar articles on healthcare and leadership from Gina Temple by clicking here.